Araghchi denies post-attack contact with US envoy Witkoff

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi refuted reports suggesting he engaged in direct communication with US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff following the Feb. 28 military offensive on Iran. In a statement on X, Araghchi characterized such claims as attempts to mislead oil traders and the public, insisting his last contact with the American diplomat preceded what Tehran terms an "illegal military attack."
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has categorically dismissed reports claiming he exchanged messages with US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff regarding the ongoing conflict, stating that all communication ceased prior to the commencement of American-Israeli military operations on Feb. 28. His denial directly challenges a recent Axios report suggesting text-based dialogue aimed at ending hostilities represented the first known direct contact since the war began.
Advertisement
Tehran rejects misleading narratives
Taking to the X platform, Araghchi responded forcefully to what he described as misinformation. "Any claim to the contrary appears geared solely to mislead oil traders and the public," the Iranian diplomat wrote, emphasizing that his last interaction with Witkoff occurred before what Tehran consistently characterizes as an unlawful military aggression against its territory. The foreign minister's statement underscores Iran's firm position that no backchannel negotiations are underway while the country faces ongoing attacks.
Advertisement
Regional confrontation continues
Since Feb. 28, the conflict has intensified across the Middle East, with Tehran launching retaliatory drone and missile strikes against American military assets stationed in Jordan, Iraq, and Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Operations have also targeted Israeli positions, disrupting global aviation routes and creating uncertainty in energy markets. Iran's strategic closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which approximately one-fifth of the world's oil passes, has added pressure on international shipping and commodity prices.
Advertisement
Military and economic dimensions
The confrontation has drawn in multiple regional actors, with Gulf states hosting US military installations finding themselves in proximity to the exchange of fire. Tehran maintains its actions are legitimate defensive measures against foreign aggression, while Washington and Tel Aviv continue their campaign that has reportedly resulted in significant casualties on both sides since late February.
Comments you share on our site are a valuable resource for other users. Please be respectful of different opinions and other users. Avoid using rude, aggressive, derogatory, or discriminatory language.