China rejects US Arctic claims over Greenland pushback

China has dismissed Washington’s remarks on Greenland as an attempt to justify unilateral ambitions in the Arctic, stressing that the region should not be treated as a geopolitical prize. Beijing’s response followed US President Donald Trump’s renewed argument that taking control of Greenland is necessary to block China and Russia, a claim China says contradicts international law and collective interests.
Beijing pushed back sharply on Monday against US comments linking China to Washington’s stated interest in Greenland, underlining that the Arctic region concerns the shared interests of the international community. China’s Foreign Ministry said its engagement in the Arctic is focused on peace, stability and sustainable development, rejecting claims that frame Beijing as a strategic threat in the High North.
China’s Arctic policy under scrutiny
Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said China opposes the use of “China or Russia as a pretext” for what she described as US efforts to pursue narrow national interests. “The Arctic region bears on the common interests of the international community,” Mao said, adding that activities there should be conducted in line with international law and with respect for all countries’ legitimate rights and freedoms.
Greenland, sovereignty and international law
The remarks came after President Trump argued that the United States must take over Greenland to prevent rival powers from gaining influence over the strategically important Arctic territory, which is an autonomous region within the Kingdom of Denmark. Speaking to reporters, Trump insisted that Washington would not allow China or Russia to establish control over Greenland, comments that drew criticism from Beijing.
Wider geopolitical implications
Asked about the prospect of one state seeking control over another’s sovereign territory, Mao said relations between countries must be handled according to the principles of the UN Charter. Greenland’s authorities have repeatedly stated their opposition to being acquired by the US, highlighting the sensitivity of Arctic geopolitics as global powers compete for influence in a region increasingly important for security, shipping routes and natural resources.
Comments you share on our site are a valuable resource for other users. Please be respectful of different opinions and other users. Avoid using rude, aggressive, derogatory, or discriminatory language.