Denmark firmly rejects any US sovereignty over Greenland

Denmark has reiterated its absolute rejection of any transfer of sovereignty over Greenland to the United States. While welcoming Trump's statement ruling out military force, Copenhagen insists the issue remains unresolved.
Denmark has issued a firm and unambiguous rejection of any negotiations or agreement that would transfer sovereignty over Greenland to the United States. The declaration from Copenhagen underscores the unwavering position of the Danish government and the autonomous Greenlandic administration that the territory is not for sale.
Rasmussen's Response to Trump's Comments
Following a meeting of Denmark's Foreign Policy Committee, Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen addressed U.S. President Donald Trump's recent remarks at the World Economic Forum in Davos. While noting it was "positive" that Trump ruled out the use of military force, Rasmussen told public broadcaster TV2, "But that will not make this case go away." He emphasized that Trump's address clearly demonstrated his continued ambition to acquire Greenland.
Trump's Position and Personal Challenge
Earlier in Davos, Trump argued that the U.S. should negotiate to acquire Greenland, stating only America has the capacity to defend and develop the strategic Arctic territory. However, he explicitly stated he would not use force, saying, "I don't want to use force. I won't use force." When later asked by a reporter about the Danish rejection, Trump responded dismissively, "If he wants to tell me, he can tell me that to my face," highlighting the personal and contentious nature of the diplomatic standoff.
The Core of the Dispute and International Stakes
The U.S. interest is driven by Greenland's Arctic location, mineral resources, and concerns about Russian and Chinese activity. Despite Trump's suspension of related tariffs following a reported "framework" with NATO, the fundamental impasse remains. Denmark's sovereignty over Greenland, a self-governing territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, is considered non-negotiable in Copenhagen and Nuuk. The dispute illustrates the challenges of 21st-century territorial diplomacy among allied nations, where historical partnerships clash with contemporary strategic ambitions.
Advertisement
Comments you share on our site are a valuable resource for other users. Please be respectful of different opinions and other users. Avoid using rude, aggressive, derogatory, or discriminatory language.