Who does the finger shaken at the community belong to, Gülen, or Demirtaş?

These days, our country is displaying sociopolitical characteristics that cannot be understood by an outsider or even those living within.

Firstly, Turkey's agenda does not develop naturally.

Our debate agenda does not arise from our own realities. This agenda isn't derived from the realities of the people; instead, artificial debates are enforced on them.

A theater is staged as if there is a pluralist system, and the bureaucratic structure succeeds at swallowing the national will during every season final.

As a result of this, the country's real problems have been pushed to the bottom, are cumulatively intensifying and are serving at cross purposes, as the bureaucratic state holds power in its hands by hiding itself from the national will.

Consequently, a struggle is given to try and curb the national will and demilitarize from the center with its bureaucracy, universities, elite capitals, media, unions and even non governmental organizations.

Basically, this story has been written with the Westernization (opposed by the people) that has been continuing over the course of 250 years.

Starting as an engineering project, this bureaucratic movement based on the imitation of the West, and taking control of power stands opposite the people.

In this sense, there are two main movements in Turkey. The westernized/secularist bureaucratic movement and the populist movement, which puts national will first. ( In this context, the conservative are progressive and the Westernized group who instrumentalize s secularism as a power device are reactionists.)

The Westernized/secularist movements main characteristic is to prevent a grassroots movement contention to arise. In fact, its existence is actually connected with this function.

According to Sait Halim Paşa, a nation's political frame and operations are only shaped with its history, past, social and political ways.

The most diverse, sectional frameworks that seem as if they are waging one another, are actually devices of this bureaucratic engineering. Powerful recruitment skills are used against opponents. In fact, Sait Halim Paşa later on meddled with the Unionists and degenerated. It is possible to find examples in recent history like Süleyman Demirel and Bulent Ecevit.

Those that roam around and supposedly fulfill a duty as an enlightened, academist, journalist, civil society supporter are actually missionaries of the Westernized Bureaucracy movement. They are each a bureaucrat and never a civilian.

Therefore, the real problem is not AK Party coming to power, but AK Party surviving and holding on as an antithesis. This was never possible previously. They were either executed like Menderes and his supporters were defused or they were picked like Demirel and Ecevit.

The Westernized/ secularist bureaucratic powers' historical defense barriers were fractured with AK Party's struggle and the elections they won, and their artfully designed and smooth running setup had fallen apart and their actors were deciphered.

This success was the reason for the AK Party and Erdoğan hatred and all gloves were taken off when they realized AK Party and its sociology were permanent. The “liberal, leftist and democratic” enlightened group, supporting AK Party and Erdoğan in the initial phases, rotated 180 degrees once they realized that AK Party was permanent. The rest is irrelevant.

Displaying democratically packaged behavior by supporting the possibility that 'the religious' were of their equal (even opposing to 28 February), the Westernized/secularist movement tried to act up-to-date and establish prestige on 'the religious'.

When the case that the possibility of the religious becoming equal to the Westernized secularists started to became reality, the battle entered a fatal phase.

The chances are; the Gülen movement ( another movement engineered by the Westernized bureaucratic engineering) was used to predominate the state, packaging this predomination as becoming democratic and ending military domination so to infuse it into the religious population. Yet, this setup ran into a national leader, Erdoğan.

Whereas, according to the main setup, AK Party and Erdoğan were temporary ( like a mould to be removed from the foundation of a building after the concrete is dry) and the Gülen/Westernized bureaucratic alliance was permanent.

One must admit that this is a very successful setup.

Erdoğan and AK Party survived through this setup and thankfully history couldn't repeat itself.

Thereupon, they decided to put in place the third parallel structure, PKK/HDP, and even divide the country through setting the community against one another. The first parallel structure was the military/ neo-nationalist tutelage, the second was Gülen and the third was the PKK/HDP. While combating the third, attention should be paid on the fourth, which is probably established or close to being established and therefore we should start thinking of how to overcome the next battle.

Whether you think of these as one or different, you should understand that they are all connected to the Westernized / secularist movement will.

Until a state which is based on the national will is founded and a constitution that can clear the state of tutelage institutions is made, parallel structures will continue entering the arena as number 5,6 and 7.

This is what is really behind the words “We won't allow you to become president of the presidential system”. And, in fact, he is shaking that finger at the nation, not Erdoğan.