Fidan's silent smile on nuclear question sends shockwaves through Israel, Greece

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan has set regional diplomatic circles ablaze without uttering a single word. His response—or deliberate lack thereof—to a direct question regarding Türkiye's nuclear weapons policy during a live television interview has been dissected by Israeli and Greek media as a calculated strategic signal, amplifying Ankara's regional deterrence posture without formal confirmation or denial.

Israeli press: 'A message delivered without words'

Israeli daily Maariv interpreted Fidan's silence as a conscious strategy of strategic ambiguity, noting that he declined to comment after several moments of conspicuous silence. The paper connected the response to Fidan's recent assessment that "no immediate war threat exists" regarding Iran, suggesting Ankara is deliberately keeping its capabilities undisclosed. Israel Hayom focused on Fidan's facial expression, asserting that "his smile alone delivered the necessary message to the intended recipients, rendering words unnecessary."

Greek media: 'Frightening silence' and strategic ambiguity

Athena's Europost described the episode as "Türkiye's unanswered question fueling Athens' worst scenarios," noting that Fidan's choice to remain silent after prolonged hesitation left a strategic vacuum filled only by speculation. Kathimerini placed the incident within the broader context of global nuclear anxiety following the expiration of the New START treaty between the United States and Russia, characterizing the timing as significant. ProNews offered the most pointed assessment, interpreting the foreign minister's refusal to answer repeated follow-up questions as "neither denial nor confirmation—but rather a demonstration of resolve."

A calculated diplomatic signal

The foreign minister's non-response effectively communicated what official statements cannot: that Türkiye, as a sovereign state confronting multiple regional threats, reserves the right to determine its own security architecture. By neither confirming nor denying interest in nuclear deterrence, Fidan signaled to regional adversaries that Ankara's capabilities—like its strategic intentions—are not open for public inventory. The carefully orchestrated ambiguity amplifies deterrence while preserving diplomatic flexibility, leaving Tel Aviv and Athens to interpret the silence according to their own security calculations.