Italy declines Trump's Board of Peace, cites constitutional limits

Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani confirmed Rome will not join the US-led Board of Peace due to constitutional incompatibility. Italy nevertheless expressed readiness to contribute to Gaza reconstruction efforts.
Italy has formally declined to participate in US President Donald Trump's Board of Peace, citing constitutional constraints. Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani confirmed the decision Wednesday, explaining that a "constitutional barrier" prevents Rome from becoming a signatory to the initiative launched in Davos last month.
Sovereignty and equality concerns
Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni had previously signaled the difficulty, telling Italian media that the board's statute presents a "compatibility issue" with Article 11 of the Italian Constitution. The article permits Italy to cede sovereignty only to international organizations established on conditions of equality among states for the purpose of ensuring peace and justice. Meloni argued these conditions are not met with the board's current structure. The legal objection underscores Rome's insistence that any multilateral mechanism must respect sovereign equality rather than operate under dominant US stewardship.
Gaza reconstruction remains priority
Despite declining membership, Tajani emphasized Italy's willingness to contribute to reconstruction efforts in Gaza—the central purpose of the board. The initiative was established within the framework of seeking a peaceful settlement for the war-battered enclave. Washington has announced that additional states have joined since 19 countries signed the charter on Jan. 22, though Italy will not be among them.
First summit approaching
The Board of Peace is scheduled to hold its inaugural leaders-level meeting in Washington on Feb. 19, with Gaza fundraising as the primary agenda item. It remains unclear whether Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will attend. Italy's decision to remain outside the formal structure while offering practical support reflects a cautious approach to US-led initiatives that test the boundaries of European constitutional and sovereignty principles.
Advertisement
Comments you share on our site are a valuable resource for other users. Please be respectful of different opinions and other users. Avoid using rude, aggressive, derogatory, or discriminatory language.