The challenge of rebuilding Gaza: accountability and sustainable vision

The reconstruction of Gaza requires both a technically sound approach and a political framework that ensures Palestinian dignity and sovereignty. A transparent funding mechanism and international cooperation led by regional actors like Türkiye will be crucial for sustainable recovery.
The reconstruction of Gaza represents one of the most complex humanitarian and political challenges of our time, requiring both immediate humanitarian response and a long-term vision for sustainable development. Beyond repairing physical infrastructure, the process must address profound social trauma and establish conditions for lasting peace, with the Palestinian people's will at the center of all efforts.
Multidimensional Reconstruction Approach
Gaza's rebuilding extends far beyond construction projects, encompassing social healing, institutional restoration, and political resolution. The territory has suffered destruction comparable to the most devastating conflicts since World War II, paralyzing healthcare, education, and all aspects of daily life. A successful reconstruction must therefore integrate immediate humanitarian aid with a comprehensive development plan that addresses both physical and social infrastructure under coordinated international supervision.
Funding Mechanisms and Regional Leadership
A transparent, multi-layered funding structure is essential for effective reconstruction. Regional actors including Türkiye, Qatar, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait could form a core coalition, combining Gulf financial resources with Turkish technical expertise in construction, healthcare, and education. International institutions like the World Bank and Islamic Development Bank should provide project-based grants and low-interest loans, while a dedicated "Gaza Reconstruction Fund" with international oversight would ensure transparency and local Palestinian involvement in decision-making.
Legal Accountability and Political Sensitivities
From an international law perspective, Israel bears legal and moral responsibility for reconstruction costs as the primary agent of destruction. Practical mechanisms could include transferring frozen Israeli assets to reconstruction funds or reallocating Palestinian tax revenues currently withheld by Israel. Any potential Israeli involvement in the process must be strictly limited to technical roles under international supervision to prevent the reconstruction from becoming another instrument of control rather than genuine recovery.
Reklam yükleniyor...
Reklam yükleniyor...
Comments you share on our site are a valuable resource for other users. Please be respectful of different opinions and other users. Avoid using rude, aggressive, derogatory, or discriminatory language.