Australian group challenges social media ban for minors in court

An Australian digital advocacy group has launched a High Court challenge against the country's forthcoming social media ban for children under 16, contending the prohibition violates young people's rights and creates significant privacy risks. The Digital Freedom Project filed proceedings Wednesday arguing the ban infringes on constitutional freedoms while exposing Australians to data security threats through required age verification processes.

Constitutional and Privacy Concerns

The legal action argues the social media prohibition is "grossly excessive" and trespasses on the constitutional right to freedom of political communication. The plaintiffs also maintain that collecting identification documents to verify ages "poses a major risk to the security of Australians' personal information online." The case is being brought by two 15-year-olds, Noah Jones and Macy Neyland, who represent the demographic affected by the ban set to take effect December 10.

Government's Firm Stance

Communications Minister Anika Wells responded that the federal government remains "firm" in its commitment to implement the legislation despite legal challenges. Wells stated that "the Albanese Labor government remains steadfastly on the side of parents, and not platforms," adding that authorities "will not be intimidated by threats" or "big tech on behalf of Australian parents." The government's position emphasizes child protection as the primary rationale for the controversial policy.

Implementation Details and Penalties

Under the new regulations scheduled to begin December 10, social media platforms including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, Snapchat, and YouTube will bear a "world-first legal obligation" to prevent anyone under 16 from creating or maintaining accounts. The law imposes substantial penalties on non-compliant platforms—fines up to $32 million—while explicitly exempting individual users and parents from any penalties for violations.