From February 7 to "Tevhid-Selam"

Never has it been witnessed that a state"s administration had protested against another state"s informative administration this openly. Until 2010, when Hakan Fidan had been assigned to the head of MIT… If you can remember, Israel"s Prime Minister Benyamin Netenyahu and that period"s Minister of Defense Ehud Barak had made heavy statements against Fidan, which accused him of being an Iran lover.

The meaning of Fidan being assimilated with Iran, who was once Israel"s mortal enemy, can be shortly summarized as follows: "Until now, Turkish intelligence had carried out works, which coincided with Israel"s benefits, sometimes by the directions and sometimes by the guidance of MOSSAD. Though, from now on the tides can change."

After Fidan had been assigned to the head of MIT, Israel had perceived this as the sign of the beginning of authentic decisions, which will strengthen the Turkish administration"s initiative in the region and tried to prevent it. Maybe it didn"t work, but Israel had been right in their "liberalization" of Turkish foreign policy worry.

As it can be understood from Syria policy, Turkey had neither acted via Iran"s nor Israel-USA"s guidance.

While Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, Israel and the USA had gathered on the same side during the coup in Egypt, Turkey had chosen to follow its own path.

It is being said that Turkey preferred to chart out its own peace direction without inserting a third foreign country (for instance, England was inserted in the Oslo process) and already had covered a longer distance when compared to the previous progresses.

Prime Minister Erdogan had been the director and the protector of these three policies, Ahmet Davutoglu had been the enforcer in the diplomatic field and their dominant actor in the field had been the MIT Undersecretary, Hakan Fidan.

Then, what focuses were out there in the world (I"m not just talking about Turkey, rather worldwide) other than Israel, who had declared Hakan Fidan as an "Iran lover"? You are correct, of course, Gülenists.

Since 2010, a campaign against Fidan was being conducted. First the Oslo leak had arrived. During the Prime Minister"s first visit to the region in the Arab Spring – in the days when it was still a "spring" – the Oslo leak had blasted. The intended reaction couldn"t be achieved, and this even had a positive effect that warmed the society towards resolution.

Afterwards, by the hands of the parallel structure in the judiciary, the investigation on the resolution process had been used as an excuse and on February 7, Fidan, who is the number one name of the state"s intelligence, had been called up to give testimony as a suspect. This had coincided with the Prime Minister"s 2nd surgery process. The state had resisted against the parallel state. It wasn"t successful again.

Finally, the "Iran" card had been openly placed on the table. During the December 17th process, what Fidan and the bureaucrats close to AK Party had been accused of was being "Iran lovers". Despite that a policy opposite of Iran"s was being carried out in Syria, Fidan"s name had been carefully used as an Iran lover.

While the Gülen media had done this more subtly in their newspapers, Gülenists in the social media had even claimed that Fidan is the adopted son of Humeyn and brought up by him.

And the Selam-Tevhid case that is in the center of the December 17th-25th process, which had been actualized in order to finalize the failed operation on February 7…. Through this fictitious organization, for three years 251 out of 2280 people, in which Prime Minister and MIT Undersecretary had been included, had been wiretapped.

In the meeting with the journalists at Dolmabahçe, the Prime Minister had summarized this case as follows:

"The prosecutor comes out and draws two equations; (he) places my son on top of the first and my groom on the other. For the head leader of the organization as me. I"m also very comfortable in this matter. I"m the leader of an organization, which had sacrificed everything in the name of uplifting the country. The name of the organization is AK Party."

What had been activated from February 7 to December 25 and had been operated up until the Tevhid-Selam organization had been the same coup line. It"s this society"s responsibility, as much as the jurisdiction"s, to face this line that aims to annihilate this government.