Historical transitions...

History does not operate with absolutes. It is very difficult to determine the beginning and the end of history. Historical movements are based on transformation. This can also be called the reproduction of a certain accumulation by pairing it with the elements derived from that accumulation. This doesn't happen all at once. It can take a long time to clear up the residues involved in the remanufacturing processes. A data transformation is not easy to complete.

Let's think about it now: We know that the 20th Century was built in 1945. One of the main indicators of this construction was the tripartite structure of the world division of labor on the basis of Capitalist-Socialist and later Non-Aligned. (We have repeatedly written that this is an illusion, that the divergences are variations of the World of Capitalist Economy). The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 were judged to bring the end of the 20th Century. This judgment was correct but incomplete. This deficiency was later reflected in the inferences and gave birth to its own mistake. What happened was judged to be a victory for the West or the Capitalist Camp. This too was an easy inference. Considering the integrated structures of the world system, no one but a narrow intellectual circle could see the collapse of the Soviet system, which is an element of this system, in fact, how severe a crisis the system was going through, that sooner or later it would move from the peripheries to the center, and that it would hit the states and societies that considered themselves victorious in those days. The dominant feature of the 20th century was state industrial capitalism. The crisis was his crisis. Beginning in the Soviet Union, it had the harshest pattern of state-owned industrial capitalism. This dynamic drove the Soviets to peak volumes in the early 1970s; but, as Marx pointed out, it resulted in the evaporation of the solid. (Stalin probably had not read Marx). The process would progress with intervals towards softer patterns. The developments we perceive in Elyev show that the global crisis has reached its center. It is possible to see the scenes that emerged in the Soviet Union of the 1990s almost exactly in Europe and America today.

The West's response to the crisis was to liquidate the first two of the state-nation-capital equation. Postmodernists, deconstructionists, Foucaults, Deluezes laid its philosophical-theoretical foundations, while Chicago Boys laid its economic foundations. Of course, from this chaotic liquidation process, those who gathered great wealth, especially the financial circles, which were the most parasitic circles in history. But that was not the solution. We're not going to talk long. But in the end, the economic-political programs implemented did not save the system.

The State, national industrial capitalism, which started in the 19th century and evolved in the 20th century, is dissolving. The 21st century is the processes of dissolution itself. In other words, the 21st century is not a restructuring, it is a century of dissolution. In other words, we realize the dissolution processes of the 20th century. So, in a way, we are still in the 20th century. It will end when the dissolution is complete. If it's going to happen, restructuring is the job of the next century.

Another thing to note is that these transitions were not without war. We see that the Ukraine-Russia war, which turns into a blind fight and seems to grow like a crimson ink blot, gives the beginning of this. One of the most important results of this war is that all the preventive measures on Germany and Japan, which were suppressed militarily in the 20th century, were lifted. This indicates that one of the most important pillars that created the 20th century and continued until the 2020s has collapsed. In the future, if possible, historiography will accompany the fall of the Berlin Wall and the fall of this column.

Both Germany and Japan were the shining stars of the 20th century in economic terms. Germany showed up in world markets with its expensive, robust products. This gave him great strength. The robustness of its economy has prevented it from ever being affected by cyclical crises. The deep expansion of the Ukraine-Russia war was that the US, which could not cope with the German economy, cut the energy lifelines of Germany with the brute power. They could not resist the liquidation of the German-Russian equation. This equation is now over. They are looking for a new way out. The way to do this is to quickly arm against Russia and strengthen its hand in the new division that will develop towards Asia. Of course, the competition between Germany-England, USA-Germany will intensify here. In the meantime, let's not forget that Britain has the fifth strongest army in the world, surpassing France. In short, war is not one-dimensional. There are wars within wars.

Japan, on the other hand, first took the stage with its cheap products. It peaked in the electronics revolution. But it lost to new pacific powers like South Korea in the digital race. Its economy is in shambles. Now it is also arming against both China and Russia. It also has Asian expansions.

It is very bad news that these two organized warring powers, on which the embargoes and restrictions have been lifted, have returned to their historical codes. Now we can be more confident that World War 3 will break out. This war will be multi-layered. This will have an effect that also stimulates and develops technology. If there is a mistake in the calculations and there is no mass destruction, this will be the one who will destroy the old world and establish the new one.