HDP-PKK and black propaganda...

Identified as the PKK and Democratic Union Party's (PYD) method, black propaganda has unfortunately been used as a “political” tool by the Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP). In a period of 13 years during which politics is of central importance, violence is no longer on life's agenda, and claiming rights has been possible through civil methods, it was expected that the HDP and PKK would experience compliance problems.

Frankly, until October 6-8, I approached the BDP/HDP with the benefit of the doubt. I tried to understand the difficulties it faced and believed some things just needed time. Because the past was ominous, and it would take time and effort to establish a trust base. On the other hand, with the start of the reconciliation process, the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) and President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan were exposed to many coup attempts. The fate of the addressee was uncertain. The BDP and HDP were reluctant, especially remaining in the background because of İmralı's weight during the Gezi incidents and the December 17 and December 25 coup attempts. We attributed this to an adaptation problem.

But, after the August 10 presidential election, and despite HDP Co-Chair Selahattin Demirtaş receiving close to 10 percent of the votes, violence and black propaganda started to take effect instead of politics gaining strength. With the Kurdish Communities Union (KCK) and HDP calling for street riots on October 6-8, many of our Kurdish citizens lost their lives. We were facing a physical revolt and a dichotomy movement. This movement was closely involved in the attempt to oust the AK Party and the president.

The HDP was virtually paying for the coup mechanics of İmralı during the Gezi and December 17/25 coup attempts.

The point that was noticed here was that the PKK and HDP and of course the PYD/YPG became a part of another project outside of Turkey, or maybe were, since the very start. Because, just after the June 7 elections, Karayılan had said that they were ready to open war on the Turkish Republic from 2012 onwards, yet they postponed this to 2013 because of seasonal reasons, and were caught off guard by the reconciliation process. He stated their regret by saying, “We should have said no to Öcalan then, we made a mistake, we couldn't say it...”

ISIL showing up and trying to occupy Kobani, was seen as an opportunity to separate Kurds from the idea of living together with Turks in harmony by the PKK and the HDP who were allergic to the reconciliation process. This implied a mutual purpose of a coup mechanism both within the country and outside. They were coherent with the elements of a coup mechanism via Jacobean secularism.

In fact, they were siblings.

How were you going to convince Kurds (excluding a marginal group), that wanted to live in peace and who had experienced this for the first time during the AK Party and the reconciliation process, to war and separatism?

With black propaganda...

This is clearly an ethical problem, but this method has an equivalent in Stalinist structures. In Leninist/ Stalinist structures, ethics is evaluated before the holy purpose that is to be obtained at the end of an action. In other words, if our purpose is to create an “ecological society, in which a cigarette butt isn't thrown on to the ground” then physical and verbal violence, lies and slander is legitimate. Yes, it is exactly this.

Everything that happened during and after October 6-8, 2014, June 7, 2015 and the Kobani incidents, was turned upside down, with the help of local and foreign media of course, and was then turned over on to Kurds and the public opinion.

This ideological immorality may seem contradictory to us. For example, while Kurds are constantly hanged in Iran, our Parliament's third party, the HDP, and its extension, the PKK, are intimates with Iran instead of Turkey. This can only be explained with this “ethics.”

Constantly expressing the term “peace,” but engaging in war, provoking street violence, digging ditches, making the lives of the Kurds miserable and holding them captive...

After July 22 and November 1, the PKK organized riots in places like Cizre, Nusaybin, Silopi, Yüksekova, dug ditches and laid the groundwork for as many civilians as possible to be killed.

But yesterday in Parliament, they acted like they were not responsible for any of this.

Kurds see this “moral” degeneracy.

November 1 was a sign of this.